Essay on Tsar Alexander IIIs Reign - 2176 Words

Tsar Alexander IIIs Reign The reign of Tsar Alexander II was one that demonstrated a great change in action, attitude and policy to that of his father, Tsar Alexander II, The Tsar Liberator. Historians have long labelled Tsar Alexander II as a Liberal, reforming ruler and his son as a reactionary, oppressive heir to his legacy. Hingley argues that his thirteen years of reign were spent ...systematically destroying all of his fathers work. The choice facing Tsar Alexander III when he ascended to the throne was a difficult one. There were two routes that he could follow: to continue the tentative steps that his father had made into reform or to back track into Conservatism in an attempt to†¦show more content†¦It is interesting, as Hingley comments, that the reign of Tsar Alexander III was ...in keeping with the tendency for stern, uncomplicated Romanov Tsars to alternate with those of gentler and more elusive temperament. This illustrates well the situation in Russia at the accession of Tsar Alexan der III, and the atmosphere throughout the majority of his reign, that it was almost diametrically opposed to that of his fathers This was his reaction to the assassination of his father. Where the Nihilists had attempted to bring a more democratic and liberal governing to Russia in the assassination they had inadvertently brought into rule a Tsar whose approach from the outset of his reign could have not have been more different. Not only this, but the actions of the Peoples Will had hardened Tsar Alexander IIIs resolve that any attempts at reform were dangerous and could only affect the stability of the monarchy. He had seen the proof for himself, that the introduction of reform could only entertain criticism and opposition to the Tsarist regime. Thus detrimentally affecting the future of the autocratic government. Hingley argues that It is an irony of history that the nihilist assassins of the Catherine Quay should have given their lives to substitute the slaughtered Tsar-Liberator for thisShow MoreRelatedEssay on How Much Russia Changed from 1856-1894609 Words   |  3 Pagesunrest. Alexander II realised the need to modernise Russia in order to prolong their status as a superpower. This stemmed from their defeat in the Crimean war. To modernise and industrialise Russia, a free workforce was needed and this could only be made available if people were freed from the land. This meant that Alexander II would need to somehow release the serfs from their owner’s land. Another reason for emancipation was made clear in a quote from Alexander II in March Read MoreCompare and contrast Alexander II and Alexander III Essay1139 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿Compare and contrast Alexander II and Alexander III Although they were father and son, the reigns of Alexander II and Alexander III took off in completely different directions. Alexander II was committed to his empire by vowing to reform Russia, making it more in line with nineteenth-century western society. His son, on the other hand, was the unprepared tsar, whose actions were literally reactions to his father’s unexpected assassination. Consequently, Alexander II went down in history as muchRead MoreComparison Between Alexander Ii and Iii Essay1572 Words   |  7 PagesCOMPARATIVE ESSAY BETWEEN ALEXANDER II AND III Tsar Alexander II and III while father and son had very different ambitions as Tsar and different view for the future of the empire. Alexander III succeeded to his father’s throne in 1894. His reign is looked upon by most historians as a time of repression that saw the undoing of many of the reforms carried out by his father. Certainly that was a time of great economic and social change but these had led, in the West of the nation, great pressureRead MoreThe War Of The Nineteenth Century1553 Words   |  7 PagesTsar Alexander II was assassinated during the midst of a reformation movement in Russia toward the end of the nineteenth century. At this time, the Russian lower class blamed Jews for their poor living conditions. When Tsar Alexander III came into power he was paranoid of being a target of an assassination. So he created a secret police to suppress civil and revolutionary outbreaks, and also introduced anti-Semitic legislations to satisfy the enraged lower class. Gove rnment officials managed to useRead MoreWhy Did Revolution Break Out in Russia in 1905?4224 Words   |  17 Pageslong-term factors which will be discussed are peasant land-hunger, the declining economy and the exploitation of Jews. For the first factor, I will begin by discussing the reign of Alexander II to Nicholas II; this will allow us to show the developments in time of peasant outrage. Secondly, the essay will discuss the reign of Alexander III who began terrible pogroms towards Jews and continued by Nicholas II, specifically the great pogroms of the early 1900’s. For the third area, the deteriorating economyRead MoreTsar Nicholas II Of Russia1923 Words   |  8 PagesTsar Nicholas II of Russia: An Emperor Unfit to Rule Ravaged Russia At the end of the nineteenth century, Tsar Nicholas II of Russia reluctantly took command of an empire overflowing with revolutionaries who were seeking change in response to hardships that their nation was facing. His timid personality, coupled with his lack of political education and military experience, made him unfit to calm the war-fueled chaos that would soon envelop Russia. Nicholas’ series of unfortunate, unprepared andRead MoreWhat Did Joseph Stalin Could Be Considered A Red Tsar?2360 Words   |  10 PagesJoseph Stalin could be considered a ‘Red tsar’ Soso Djugashvili, more commonly known as Joseph Stalin, ‘man of steel’, dictator of the Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) Russia, can be considered a ‘Red Tsar’ to an extent when features of Stalinism are compared to those of Tsarism and Russia ruled by Nicholas II’s autocratic regime from 1894 to 1917. A ‘Red Tsar’ is a communist leader whom follows similar principles followed under the leadership of a Tsar, that were influenced by few opinions allowingRead MoreThe Russian Bolshevik Revolution And The Soviet Revolution1578 Words   |  7 Pages as he declared his intentions to maintain his father’s form of monarchy, much to the dismay of the majority of Russia. The roots of revolution took hold in 1891 during Alexander III’s reign, three years prior to Nicholas’s ascension to the throne. The government, at that time under the leadership of Nicholas’s father, Alexander III, responded insufficiently to the fami ne that began during 1891. The government purportedly held back food relief pending the confirmation of statistical evidence statingRead MoreRussia Notes as/A2 1881-19147263 Words   |  30 Pagesused on farms – subsistence farming. †¢ Largest standing army in Europe. †¢ No political parties and the press was heavily censored. †¢ Fierce loyalty to the Tsar – often enforced by brutal secret police. †¢ Royalty owned most of the land – Tsar’s estate was larger than some countries. †¢ 1861 – Tsar Alexander II freed serfs but peasants still tied to land. †¢ Aristocracy could no longer buy/sell peasants and they could freely marry. †¢ Government loans given to peasants